Warwickshire CCC unofficial fans forum
bearsfans.org.uk
Member
Joined:
Posts: 83

Hasan just out. I'd declare now - quick runs are OK but no point pootling about.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 131

Really hope we can make this dominant position tell.

4 bonus point so far isn't it.

And Surrey score looking v promising.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 305

Not sure why OHD came out faced 2 balls and then next over Burgess faced a couple before declaring. A great score though - let's see if OHD et al can turn them over now

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

Totally agree with the declaration seeming odd. The only thing I can think of is Rushworth came back and said that it was very flat and we’d need all the time we could get.

It’s looking very hard going for the bowlers already. But I’ll be interested to see how Briggs goes.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 305

BristolBear wrote:

Totally agree with the declaration seeming odd. The only thing I can think of is Rushworth came back and said that it was very flat and we’d need all the time we could get.

It’s looking very hard going for the bowlers already. But I’ll be interested to see how Briggs goes.

Nah! Both openers gone still over 500 behind - some really tight bowling

Member
Joined:
Posts: 611

Excellent point by Roland Butcher these pitches tailor made for Hassan he'll have grown up on them

Member
Joined:
Posts: 305

Looking that was,mad, 3 wickets down and still over 500 behind!!

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

OHD looks a completely different bowler in his second spell. Ball climbing off the pitch, pushing players back, then beating the edge as they hesitate to get forward.

Funny what a wicket or 2 can do for a team. Time to capitalise now.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 611

It doesn't feel quite so warm here in Brum today maybe the same there but these Notts lads will be wiped out from being out on their feet all day yesterday and half of today. Greenish wicket but one I thought wouldn't provide all that much assistance to our attack I thought wrongly it seems

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

I too appear to have really misread the pitch. Thought it would be tough going early and then lose the green and get really flat.
Appears keeping them out there for as long as we did has drained them mentally. Tough to concentrate and make the right choices when batting if you’re physically and mentally exhausted from being cooked.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 305

bad light halting our march. Should have put the spinners on.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

But how can it be bad light without the floodlights being on?
Surely you turn the lights on first?

And they keep saying it’s not raining on the stream. Don’t want to be robbed due to time lost again this year. Happened with Somerset, almost with Kent.

Administrator
Joined:
Posts: 465

Looking at the radar, I think that could be it for the day. A big thunderstorm moving in

Administrator
Joined:
Posts: 465

No protection for the bowlers run-ups seems “convenient”

Member
Joined:
Posts: 222

Gone about ad good as it could have done for Warwickshire today - but our opposition in the others games have had a good second half of the day as well. Surrey folded for 145, good to have them get zero batting bonus points, but have chipped away at Kent in the afternoon. Could easily see a situation where Surrey chase down 400 in the sun with plenty of time in the game while we can't quite break down Notts twice and the gap widens. Hants recovering well against Lancs, but they've got far more to do to get a win.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 523

Have faith Tayls79, Surrey have been out-played and showed that they are not invincible as some think but I know what you mean about a run chase in the 4th innings. Without any more rain I think we will win but a problem must be to enforce the follow-on or not. If it feels right to bowl, carry on and enforce it. All depends on what Notts get. If they are 200 allout, why bat again with a 370+ lead.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 222

Haha, I of little faith. And don't get me wrong, what will be, will be. My point was only really that Surrey and Hampshire, our competition, turned it on in co-ordinated fashion which would change the look of the top of table.

paulbear wrote:

Have faith Tayls79, Surrey have been out-played and showed that they are not invincible as some think but I know what you mean about a run chase in the 4th innings. Without any more rain I think we will win but a problem must be to enforce the follow-on or not. If it feels right to bowl, carry on and enforce it. All depends on what Notts get. If they are 200 allout, why bat again with a 370+ lead.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

I think it’s one of those where we need to take care of ourselves first. Then we can see their results. Let’s get these last 5, make a decision on the follow on, and see what happens.

One big thing for us is that, we’ve got 4 batting points, Surrey and Hampshire got none. We should get full bowling points (please don’t let this jinx it). So even if they win. We gain ground, and have a game in hand.
Hampshire still trail by over 100 in their second innings. Surrey trail by over 350 with Kent still having 4 wickets in hand. Let’s keep our fingers crossed but first things first, let’s take care of our business. Hopefully, some moisture and the covers have juiced the pitch up, and we can make it tough for Notts today.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 285

I think if we are in a position to follow on we should enforce it.

Either we bowl them out cheaply and haven't had too many overs in the field (with a break in between) so should be fresh enough to go again. Or they'll have batted for a while and we won't have enough time to bat again and then bowl them out.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 773

Handy that Moores and Harrison both decided to partake in coordinated batting self-destruction in consecutive balls.
They were being deeply stubborn and then….