Warwickshire CCC unofficial fans forum
bearsfans.org.uk
Member
Joined:
Posts: 133

130 after winning the toss is terrible.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 254

meashambear wrote:

Moeen poor again. Terrible choice of shot. He seems to think that he can just whack everything into the stands with little respect for the pace, line or length of the delivery, or the bowler.

That is 4 failures with the bat now at a strike rate of around 100. Anyone else would expect to be dropped.

Well, he won't be playing again in the T20 this season - sorted!


'The only good banker, is the Lickey Banker!'

Member
Joined:
Posts: 254

meashambear wrote:

meashambear wrote:

And now Davies out with a ridiculous shot

What the hell are these batsmen thinking?

You would think that Moeen & Maxwell have something to do with this.

Two of the most sought after T20 players on the planet and both have been completely abject

Yep, the consequences of being 'parachuted' into an English season so soon after the IPL - with no practice or acclimatision.


'The only good banker, is the Lickey Banker!'

Member
Joined:
Posts: 254

meashambear wrote:

I am pretty lost for words tbh

5 down and 9 overs to go and Benjamin tries to sweep for 6 and gets caught, a few balls after Mousley tries a ridiculous shot in front of his stumps.

We desperately need to drop Benjamin.


'The only good banker, is the Lickey Banker!'

Member
Joined:
Posts: 254

Just as we were slagging off Moeen for his batting, his bowling turns the cards - 3 for 14 at the moment!


'The only good banker, is the Lickey Banker!'

Member
Joined:
Posts: 254

Those well known spin twins - Mousley & Moeen!!


'The only good banker, is the Lickey Banker!'

Super Moderator
Joined:
Posts: 1279

Oh ye of little faith!
(Well, me too if I'm honest!)

Member
Joined:
Posts: 103

Ok...........maybe spoke too soon

Good win in the end and great stuff in the field. Northants should have knocked those runs off though and we need to address our sloppiness if we want to bat first

Super Moderator
Joined:
Posts: 1279

Maybe it was such a well worn pitch (albeit a hybrid) that the correct tactics would have been to graft for 150 or so rather than aim for 200 and fail.

Administrator
Joined:
Posts: 465

Yeah I think 150 would probably have been about par, especially with our spin options. We could have bowled all 20 overs with spin!

Member
Joined:
Posts: 523

Hard to believe what we have just seen. The bloke in front of me said, "Maybe it's a crap wicket and we'll get something out of it too". Spot on sir. Was it the same wicket as the on used on Wednesday? The ball that Maxwell got seemed to stop on him which made it look like a poor shot. Perhaps that is the key now, produce wickets that are slow and turn and have 4 spinners in the side. It makes Hain's innings (Top score yet again) look even better and yet he never had the chance to try and cut loose as he had to try and bat to the end. We really needed this but the group is still wide open.

Super Moderator
Joined:
Posts: 1279

The pitch had been played on at least twice before and it showed.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 133

Well played the spin quartet. Surely the groundsman would give a clue to how it would play and perhaps we may have selected Lintott instead of Miles, but in the end it didn't matter.
What a talent Mousley is, by the way.
And big shout out to Rhodes on Bears TV commentary who called it as a low scoring thriller and is a natural broadcaster. Career in the media awaits when he hangs up his whites.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 523

Still hard to see us winning after our innings but that's what happens sometimes. I remember us defending 142 to beat Worcestershire once and a slightly higher total to beat Yorkshire but that must be one of the best defences of a small total in the T20. Spinners 8-70 from 16 overs. Also, just looked again at the Mousley wicket and as an LBW it looks very dodgy.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 1077

Yeah it just didn't look right did it.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 285

I remember the Worcester 142 as well but on that day I think they batted poorly rather than us bowling exceptionally.

I've been critical of the bowling unit but yesterday I think they did bowl exceptionally. Our dismissals were mostly poor shots, their dismissals were mostly good balls. Mousley and Mo we're excellent.

Am also glad I'm backed up on the Mousley decision as posted straight after it happened and first response was saying it was hitting middle and leg!

Member
Joined:
Posts: 523

I played it back many times and paused it on impact with the pads and I would have gone with the batsman. Yes, we gave away plenty of wickets, such, that my comments if we lost were going to be along the lines of Northants not needing any catching practice during fielding drills as we gave them plenty. Also, it is strange to get bowled out when batting first, but not bowling out the other side whilst still winning the game.

Member
Joined:
Posts: 305

Due to being out for the evening I missed the game live. So later on and watched it from the beginning. Seeing how most of our wickets fell trying to hit the ball in to Cannon Hill Park I very nearly switched the TV off at the interval. Thank goodness I didn't - some superb all round bowling and fielding and has been said virtually all the wickets were achieved through skillful bowling. As a critic of him so far I will say Moeen's bowling was of the highest order.