We've made him a 'sizeable' offer apparently...

28, in his prime. Very good T20 bowler, not seen much of him in 4 day but his stats are decent.
If he’s committed to playing all formats, it would be a really good signing.

Bit hard to see why. For the cc how does he get in the team ahead of Ed Barnard?(Ethan Brookes disease is the correct medical term). His most eye catching stat is a plus 150 T20 strike rate batting down the order which seems to be valued highly by coaches. I've seen quite a bit of him and he is quite an appealing, pugnacious cricketer. Perhaps a more switched replacement for George Garton?

Think he's a better bowler than Barnard but Barnard a better batter.