Bald_Reynard wrote:

The_Lickey_Banker wrote:

Bald_Reynard wrote:

Andy wrote:

He might come in for Carver...

Dan M is in for Bulpitt, Carver stays. They've obviously gone with the extra spinner / batsman instead of a seamer - shame, I would have liked the left armer to be given another chance (though I'm sure we'll see him again). Team:-

Pollock, Yates, Rhodes, Burgess, Mousley, Lamb, Bethell, E Brookes, Carver, Garrett & Johal.

We won the toss and elected to bowl.

Although York wasn't Carver's home Club ground, he will have bowled there a lot (he played for Sheriff Hutton Bridge for 4 years, in the same League) - and it might well be a wicket that takes spin (a lot of Yorkshire Club grounds do).

And of course, an 'old boy', returning to a County who have released him, is always wanting to prove a point ! Added to the fact, that he should well know his opponents batting weaknesses (though the downside, is they'll know his bowling weaknesses!).

The extent to which Carver and Rhodes have been tonked by the Yorkie batsmen today, clearly shows they know the bowling weaknesses of their former team mates ! Carver 10 overs, 1 for 64, Rhodes 5 overs, 1 for 48 ! Mind you, Ethan Brookes got whopped for 73 in his 7 overs ! Yorkshire finished on 320 for 7 (only George Garrett came out with any distinction - 2 for 24, off 7 overs). Even if it is small ground and our batsmen have been in form recently (well, one batsman, each match !), that is a huge ask of us ?

The_Lickey_Banker wrote:

Bald_Reynard wrote:

Andy wrote:

He might come in for Carver...

Dan M is in for Bulpitt, Carver stays. They've obviously gone with the extra spinner / batsman instead of a seamer - shame, I would have liked the left armer to be given another chance (though I'm sure we'll see him again). Team:-

Pollock, Yates, Rhodes, Burgess, Mousley, Lamb, Bethell, E Brookes, Carver, Garrett & Johal.

We won the toss and elected to bowl.

Although York wasn't Carver's home Club ground, he will have bowled there a lot (he played for Sheriff Hutton Bridge for 4 years, in the same League) - and it might well be a wicket that takes spin (a lot of Yorkshire Club grounds do).

And of course, an 'old boy', returning to a County who have released him, is always wanting to prove a point ! Added to the fact, that he should well know his opponents batting weaknesses (though the downside, is they'll know his bowling weaknesses!).

Andy wrote:

He might come in for Carver...

Dan M is in for Bulpitt, Carver stays. They've obviously gone with the extra spinner / batsman instead of a seamer - shame, I would have liked the left armer to be given another chance (though I'm sure we'll see him again). Team:-

Pollock, Yates, Rhodes, Burgess, Mousley, Lamb, Bethell, E Brookes, Carver, Garrett & Johal.

We won the toss and elected to bowl.

Andy wrote:

He might come in for Carver...

Yep, thinking about it, you're probably right Andy. Dan's off spin has come on well this last year and he does merit a place in the bowling (though he didn't have a fantastic T20 run). Of course, we desperately need a longer batting lineup (Carver was going in at 8, which is way higher than his record supports) and DM at 4, 5 or 6, with Brookes dropping down to 7 and Bethell down to 8, is far better.

13 man squad, including Dan Mousley (as predicted by Andy):-

Rhodes, Bethell, Ethan Brookes, Bulpitt, Burgess, Carver, Garrett, Johal, Lamb, Mousley, Pollock, van Vollenhoven & Yates

If he is fully fit, I'm sure Dan will be straight back in, but then, which 2 will be left out ? KvV would be one, but I can't predict the other.

We're really lucky that all the RLC games in our Group were rain affected and finished as No Result. So, everyone playing today got 1 point. We stay fourth, a lot of rivals have missed out on a win and have one less game in hand (some, played 4, the same as us). It makes a change for us to get benefit from the weather.

coolerking wrote:

Brookes and Lamb playing a blinder here. Chris Wright getting the full treatment.

A wonderful 6th wicket partnership of 153 between Lamb and Brookes. Matt got 119NO off 105 balls (at last showing his quality in white ball) and Ethan, 63. We made 303 for 6 - not bad after being 121 for 5 after 23 overs. Rob Yates also keeping his form up, with 72. Pollock a duck, Bethell with 3 and Burgess with 12, were the only ones not doing it today. Chris Wright got caned - 60 off his 7 overs (8.5 an over !), for no wickets.

GerryShedd wrote:

I was confused at first because Cricinfo currently has only nine men in the Bears' team - hopefully they will put that right.
It will be interesting to see how Bulpitt and Carver fare. I am pleased that Bethell stays in the team because he looks like a real talent to be nurtured.

Pollock, Yates, Rhodes, Lamb, Bethell, Brookes, Burgess, Carver, Johal, Garrett and Bulpitt.

We don't bat very long with that lineup - pretty much stopping at 7. I hope Derby don't set a big target or our early batters (finally) get a few runs - and quickly, given how much the overs are likely to be reduced even more.

Bald_Reynard wrote:

12 man squad:-

Rhodes, Bethell, E Brookes, Bulpitt, Burgess, Carver, Garrett, Johal, Lamb, Pollock, van Vollenhoven and Yates.

Sidebottom injured and Chaprakani got exams!

I guess we'll see Bulpitt & Carver in and KvV might get another chance, with Garrett as 12th man - though that will depend on a view on whether the wicket will be better for spin or seam (and of course Kiel is a far better batsman than George).

Play has started, we won the toss and (naturally, given the extreme likelihood of rain later), chose to bowl. The match is already reduced to 45 overs.

Garrett is in, rather than KvV. Bulpitt and Carver also make their Bears 1st team debuts.

12 man squad:-

Rhodes, Bethell, E Brookes, Bulpitt, Burgess, Carver, Garrett, Johal, Lamb, Pollock, van Vollenhoven and Yates.

Sidebottom injured and Chaprakani got exams!

I guess we'll see Bulpitt & Carver in and KvV might get another chance, with Garrett as 12th man - though that will depend on a view on whether the wicket will be better for spin or seam (and of course Kiel is a far better batsman than George).

GerryShedd wrote:

Bearing in mind that Sidebottom went off part way through the Notts innings and then batted with a runner, I fear that we may need to add him to the walking wounded list. The situation with quick bowlers is almost as bad as it was two years ago. I know that Paul Farbrace said that he was changing the training routines to avoid the same problems arising but it doesn't seem to have worked too well.
As for the weather, the pessimist in me thinks that the main worry is that the predicted storms will hold off and won't save the Bears from another defeat. But let's hope that the sun and the Bears both shine tomorrow.

So, if Sidey is out, then it's Miles, if fit, or Bulpitt? I don't think Ryan is really cut out for white ball, so I'd be happy with CM or Bulpitt. The former is predictable, but uninspiring, the latter COULD be a game changer. I am so looking forward to seeing a left arm seamer again turn out for us. I keep saying it, Giles's willingness to let Keith Barker go, was one of the biggest tragedies for us in recent times!

Even though losing 2 matches out of 8 is likely to mean we'll miss out on a top 4 in the RLC, I do think a win tomorrow or Friday is vital, if the teams confidence is to be regained - and particularly needed for the youngsters, who have been thrown in at the deep end. I really hope the likes of Johal, KvV, Bethell and Brookes, who have shown such promise in many Seconds games this season, won't be judged too quickly on their performances in these RLC matches, which are as much a disaster for older and wiser heads in the squad (with a couple of honourable exceptions, like Rob Yates).

I agree, the weather could be a big downer for tomorrow, not a good forecast.

Pretty much a trouncing by Notts - 86 runs. Yates, the pick of the batsmen with a ton and decent 30's from Rhodes and Lamb, but the lack of experience in the youngsters shone through, with only Bethell showing anything (20). Brookes, Chakrapani and van Vollenhoven, all out in single figures.

Chris B now the star man for Phoenix. That's only his third professional game, yet in every match, he's been a key man. Whether we unearthed this gem, by luck or judgement, I don't know (apparently Westwood saw him at an ECB Trials Tournament at Loughborough Uni), but he certainly is hitting the headlines now.

Chris Benjamin, the star of the match - again! All the commentators can't believe this was only his third professional game. We've really unearthed a gem - by luck or judgement I don't know.

From what the BBC said, he's found shots that nobody has seen before. He could be a reason for me to tune into the 100 - I couldn't face that prospect a week ago. I saw the Oval v Manchester game yesterday - and quite enjoyed it. Phoenix are not my beloved Warwickshire, but might be worth following?!

Highveld wrote:

The video interview with Mark Robinson last night suggest that Rhodes and Yates were certain to play. Miles will depend on his fitness after the game at Durham.

Who will drop out from Cardiff? Obviously, Benjamin, replaced by Yates. Who for Rhodes - Chaprakani? If Miles is fit, I'd definitely drop Garrett - he's done nothing this season. If Miles is out, I'd give Bulpitt a go.

Only 1 Bear in the team for our first 'Home' game (Benjamin) - and he's only been a Bear for 4 weeks! Not a Birmingham team at all (though the Captain is a Brummie) ?!

paulbear wrote:

So the priority seems to be to not try and win this game then if we are allowing 3 in-form players to miss the game to play in a tour game. I agree that it is nice to see new faces in a side and hope they do well but this is stupid. I am glad I am not watching. If it looks as though a similar team will be out for Sunday's game then I might give it a miss. If you consider that I am a member like many others and didn't sign up for us to send out a 2nd XI, this would be nothing short of "taking the p***".

Well, the Captain, Miles and Yates should be back at least. I guess 3 of the youngsters will drop out for them. To be honest, with them back, we won't be far short of a reasonably strong XI. That's not to say we'll do any better than today though - 221 is not great and Glamorgan are cruising along with the run rate, only 3 wickets down.

Bald_Reynard wrote:

Andy wrote:

Pollock
Benjamin
Lamb
Bethell
Chakrapani
Burgess
Brookes
KvV
Garrett
Johal
Sidebottom
Bulpitt

In fact it is Bulpitt who is left out. I guess they decided to go with Chakrapani as the extra batsman, rather than a seamer (with 4 in anyway - Brookes, Garrett, Sidebottom & Johal). 3 spinners (Lamb, Bethell & KvV).

Team (batting order):-

Pollock, Benjamin, Lamb, Burgess, Bethell, E Brookes, Chakrapani, van Vollenhoven, Garrett, Sidebottom & Johal

We won the toss and decided to bat.

Andy wrote:

Pollock
Benjamin
Lamb
Bethell
Chakrapani
Burgess
Brookes
KvV
Garrett
Johal
Sidebottom
Bulpitt

From that 12, I guess Chakrapani will be left out.

Hose has withdrawn from the 100 - a foot injury. I don't know how bad, but I guess there might be a chance he'll be fit for the latter stages of the RLC. He's been replaced by Chris Benjamin for Phoenix - talk about a rapid rise for CB, he didn't even have a County contract 4 weeks ago !