GerryShedd
Super Moderator
It's a big stretch from "unavailable" to "dropped" so although it may be convenient to use Burgess as another stick with which to beat Mr. Robinson, I would personally doubt that the Club are lying about Burgess. I have no idea why he is unavailable - it may be a family matter and therefore very personal. Maybe the reason will emerge or maybe not.
I don't know anyone apart from Marina.
All I would add is that I've several times on here and on the predecessor Board encouraged posters who are eligible to stand for election and, as far as I know, no-one has. I'm too old and located in the wrong place so I couldn't stand.
In the replay on the Club site, you can stop the action at the critical moment and the run out looks very marginally not out. In the old days, the umpire would have said to the complaining batsman "Look at tomorrow's paper"; I guess now they would say "Look on Cricinfo."
Unless I mis-heard him, Mark Robinson suggests that, as well as the Burgess dismissal being "unlucky", the run out was a bad umpiring decision too:
https://edgbaston.com/news/mark-robinson-reflects-on-somerset-draw/
I can see that, where DRS is in operation, umpires can be judged by what proportion of their decisions prove to be successful. But that obviously doesn't apply to many county matches.
It used to be the case that county captains filled in an evaluation of the umpires after each match. This allegedly led to a reluctance on the part of umpires to give captains out. That was particularly so back in the days of amateur captains when the umpire was almost certainly a retired professional player and knew that he was supposed to touch his forelock to any amateur and call him "Sir".
Well, here's a bizarre story but with a happy ending:
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/ex-england-cricket-stars-son-and-family-rescued-from-atlantic-after-whale-attack/
My colleagues Harry Everett reports on today's events:
https://deepextracover.com/2022/09/lv-county-championship-warwickshire-v-somerset-day-four/
We had an interesting day together yesterday viewing things from our different perspectives. He seems to have picked up some Bears related snippets from me - e.g. his Alex Davies remarks in today's report.
Would having the King of Spain in post help the diversity quota?
If your interest stretches back to the Fifties and Sixties, I can recommend Laker and Lock, The Odd Couple by Christopher Sandford. It's the story of the two great spin bowlers for Surrey and England who regarded each other more as rivals than as teammates.
Paul Farbrace's job being advertised, though I thought he was called Director of Sport, a title I never quite understood.
https://edgbaston.com/news/vacancy-director-of-cricket/
It sets the expectations pretty high - I'm surprised that there is no mention of walking on water or being able to achieve wonders with loaves and fishes.
It looks like the decisions are being delayed so that next year's schedule will be the same as this year, with any changes coming in later:
https://www.thecricketer.com/Topics/countycricket/vote_domestic_schedule_delayed_current_structure_2023_season.html
Stephen Chalke, in his history of the County Championship, records 28 different scoring systems used to decide the positions in the table. That was published in 2015 so we must be up to over 30 now. Maybe they will get it right one day.
The unsung heroes of Warwickshire's season are the groundstaff under Gary Barwell so it's good to see them getting some credit here:
https://edgbaston.com/news/gary-barwell-talks-longest-and-hardest-season-for-grounds-team/
"Highlights" of the interview with the new ECB Chairman in the Telegraph, with my thoughts in brackets:
He voted against The Hundred but he is now backing it, arguing that he was simply representing his members’ interests in his former role. [Not good news!]
He will conduct an immediate cost review of the ECB – “the question is, can the ECB afford to be a big organisation,” he said – and wants to bring more cricket knowledge to the board, with two first-class chairs shortly to join as observers. [Good - but why only as observers?]
"Careers are defined by what they do with a red ball but I think the issue of how many matches has to be debated as part of the whole schedule." {coded way of saying fewer matches?]
“Accommodating four competitions is very hard, but we have to work hard to make sure all four can flourish, not with one at the expense of the other.” [You can't get a pint into a quart pot but he's a miracle worker, so no problem!]
Overall, he feels the board needs to communicate better.[No sh**, ,Sherlock!]
"You have to take the members with you.” [Ay, there's the rub, as Warwickshire's oldest member once said]
It's also good to see Gloucestershire doing well against Somerset because Glos. are almost doomed whereas Somerset could well claw their way above us. Having seen the Taunton weather forecast for tomorrow, I think it will be a draw with Gloucestershire well on top.
Spreading the Blast over a longer time makes it less likely that counties will be able to sign overseas stars but I agree that a regular slot has an appeal, as does supporters not having to cram in and pay for too many games in a short time.
For me, everything comes back to the fact that we are all tiptoeing round the giant elephant in the room known as The Hundred, which is supposedly untouchable.
LeicesterExile wrote:
There might be 19000 at the 16.4 game but how many tickets were actually sold?
As for a stadium with a roof - how high would the roof need to be or would it be if it hit the roof then to be out the fielder would have to catch the ball one handed!!!
Regarding a Stadium with a roof, I did see two ODIs between Australia and South Africa at the Dockland Stadium in Melbourne with the roof closed about 20 years ago. It's where the Melbourne Renegades play in the Big Bash. I can't remember what the local rule is about hitting the roof. I have long thought that all the money spent making grounds like Cardiff and Durham fit for international cricket could have been spent creating one or more indoor stadia. They used drop-in pitches at the Docklands Stadium. I know they had problems getting the outfield grass to grow well but I assume that the technology has improved in the last 20 years.
Anyway, I can't see MCC selling Lord's and building a new ground any time soon (or ever).
Another interesting perspective on the English cricketing calendar:
https://wisdenblog.wordpress.com/2022/03/02/the-thick-end-of-the-wedge/