Exiled Bear
Administrator
I actually thought that Dawson looked quite threatening towards the end today, but that might have been because we were playing for the close a bit. Barker seems to be their only other threat now that Abbas is injured (and presumably won't bowl tomorrow).
296 to win, then. I'm not confident...
Rhodes under-bowling himself again - only five overs this innings. Has he forgotten that he took five wickets in the first innings?! Amazed he didn't have a go when that partnership was going, he has a knack of taking breaking partnerships.
Think we've got to keep the target under 250 if we're going to have a chance. A defeat would be very damaging to our title ambitions with Yorkshire winning and Notts likely to win, and a draw doesn't seem likely so we really could do with winning this one.
I also think that Somerset losing made us less likely to go for the win. No point risking a defeat to go for a win with three games still to go.
With the tail that we have, I'd say 371 is about par from there.
coolerking wrote:
These last two wickets may yet put on a few runs but from a fantastic platform of 244 for 3, not reaching 400 would be a disappointment. The slow scoring did rob the innings of some momentum. That's a platform middle order batters dream about.
I'd have taken this position from 7/2 though!
The other thing to consider is that Lancashire only needed one more wicket for another bonus point themselves.
Really poor. Their total was probably below par but we never got going. They shouldn’t have got more than 150 really which would have been much more doable.
Will Woakes be allowed to play?
Right, I've enabled reCAPTCHA when signing up (and signing in), which should stop the bots...
Apologies for the spate of spammers over the last day or so. If it continues then I'll try to work out a permanent solution to stop it. I'm going to disable the forum overnight to prevent a flood of spam signups while I'm not able to delete them - sorry for the disruption!
Brilliant finish - 84 runs for the last two wickets!
All our batsmen made it to double figures - that can't happen very often.
paulbear wrote:
So the priority seems to be to not try and win this game then if we are allowing 3 in-form players to miss the game to play in a tour game. I agree that it is nice to see new faces in a side and hope they do well but this is stupid. I am glad I am not watching. If it looks as though a similar team will be out for Sunday's game then I might give it a miss. If you consider that I am a member like many others and didn't sign up for us to send out a 2nd XI, this would be nothing short of "taking the p***".
I think your anger should be directed at the ECB and The Hundred rather than Warwickshire CCC…
white-lightning wrote:
Good win again today. I noticed Woakes was missing again? Not sure of the reason, Covid isolation? It seems the ECB have done their utmost this season to keep Woakes from playing for the Bears!
According to the match preview on the official website Woakes has some sort of knee injury.
Thank you Leicestershire and better luck next time Worcestershire! 😉 Does anyone know if Brathwaite will be available for the quarter final? His batting in particular has been great these last couple of games.
Hopefully Lancashire will lose tomorrow and then we’ll know that a win will be enough, no matter what happens in the Worcestershire match
Do games which were rained off count as "completed matches"?