I was just watching on the feed. A caller said if Worcs get just over 200 (which they just did) and Notts lose with 160 in reply, then that's enough for Worcs to overtake us on NRR with their games played out. Some great hitting by Brookes to get them there.

Both the last two posts are the point of this competition: Development. Agree Kai needs to take the gloves and this is a good opportunity to practice and for Davies to rest from behind the stumps (indeed, if he plays at all). Barnard has also developed in this competition, his run with the bat in 2023 changed things for him massively in his status at the club.

He was only ever signed as back-up, I'm not sure we saw him as an emerging player we were going to develop into high end. As such I wouldn't describe him as poor, but maybe just "Performed as expected".

KingofSpain wrote:

Miles did quite well that one season but 122 wickets over six years in all formats is a poor return. I wish him well and he will be at his level in the second division.
Maybe we can get Singh Dale coming in the opposite direction as an upgrade.

Right. It never seems to work either. I had forgotten about Davies in '23 until Andy mentioned it, but I do remember now that Davies didn't get much output in this period and was somehow out of sorts - which is understandable.

The case, also from 2023 of one team keeping their team together for the final and beating a team who parachuted back in their hundred players tells a story that building a scratch squad quickly but consistently is key to this competition.

GerryShedd wrote:

There is the capacity for players in a Hundred squad but not actually playing to go back to their county for a match/matches; but that just complicates matters further.

Yeah I can remember now. Did he get not many when Barnard got a century in the game versus Durham that year?

Andy wrote:

Tayls79 wrote:

Passed me by that Davies isn't part of the 100. I don't want to start another pile on but was quite looking forward to seeing Barnard / Yates opening as thought that was quite complimentary. Good to see Booth, Hamza and Taz get a run in the side again. Will Bamber do 50 over?

When Davies got released from the Hundred to play ODC for us in 2023 he slotted into the middle order so I think it would be reasonable to expect Barnard and Yates to open the innings again.

Right, NZ have white ball games first against Zim (Presume Latham doesn't get selected for these) starting from Friday and then two tests (which I presume he does) starting 30 July and finishing 11 August. Not sure how long his absence would be. Latham would definitely be a good addition to the Metro Bank squad, even if it is just mentoring a batch of second team players.

GerryShedd wrote:

I think Webster was only signed until the end of July and has since been called up by Australia for their tour of West Indies. Latham was signed for the season but I see that New Zealand have two Tests coming up v Zimbabwe so I don't know if he may be needed for those.
It also looks as if Pakistan are playing T20 and ODI matches in August, which may rule out Hasan Ali.
Who would be a county coach trying to sort out overseas players' availability?

Passed me by that Davies isn't part of the 100. I don't want to start another pile on but was quite looking forward to seeing Barnard / Yates opening as thought that was quite complimentary. Good to see Booth, Hamza and Taz get a run in the side again. Will Bamber do 50 over?

Situation isn't hopeless. A win against Derby gets a QF spot. I can't quite perambulate the situation but maybe even a defeat will do it, all the teams below us have more to do and harder games to play. A QF against Somerset or Surrey might be quite liberating. One thing that's come across after watching the last two games is there is a lack of confidence and assurance - a 'nothing to lose' QF attitude might free them up a bit. If they tense up and play a nervy defeat then it's the same as the worst parts of the Robinson era. And that's an unfortunate reality of the season: Westwood has had no choice but to continue the approach of Robinson this year, he may be able to change a few things over the long close season.

I've seen Davies bat four times this season and he's been out to an impulsive shot outside off stump every time. His reaction has always been the same, aghast, so its not considered or pre-planned. How does he go about solving this bearing in mind it's not in his conscious control?

That is an interesting card. I was first involved in cricket in 1992/93 and there are a lot of players in their heyday on this card who retired when I started watching. Didn't know Adrian Pierson played for us, he was prominent for Leicestershire in one of the first cc games I watched at Edgbaston.

Interesting to see who's got who to play. Looks like we have the easiest run in and with Lancs losing RR against Yorks looks like a real possibility of second. Second or third means Surrey or Hampshire in the quarters... Not sure what to make of that!

I don't think loads short but definitely could have got more. I don't watch that much any more but was only really Hain and Barnard that looked at ease, everyone else was jittery, which I think was exactly the same comment I made on the CC game at Sussex.

Indeed Bethell in for Yates, Yates was originally in for Moeen and Bethell for Mo is a like-for-like. Yates needs to stay close to the squad though, He will need to sub in for Latham when the latter goes to NZ international duty. Good to see England have finally released Bethell. The hawks are circling with Crawley in the test team and Jacob could stand in here (though unlikely to open) but overall Bethell's next international duty is likely to be the England September white ball games so good to get a tune up now, ahead of the 100.

EDIT - indeed, we still need Yates in the side or not enough batsmen. Either way, good to have Jacob back!

Bethell situation is different to Woakes, Woakes has had a bad knee condition for years, he added pace which cost physical effort and has meant he's needed his loads managing for a while. Bethell I find maddening right now as he has nothing like the stresses on his body. It's looking like he might not play a single test this season, so getting two T20 games in right now probably sets him up well for the 100 and then the England white ball games in September - which he's far more likely to play.

Highest T20 strike rate of any of our top order with the exception of Bethell (who has a smaller sample size). It way well be true to say he isn't performing right now, however. Overall point still holds though, if Mo ain't there we still need a fast scoring batsman.

LeicesterExile wrote:

Post #25 - not sure I understand describing Moeen as an explosive batsman. Since he returned he has done very little to even justify his place and, to me, gives the impression of just turning up for a final pay cheque.
Latham, to me, has been a big disappointment and hardly justifies being selected ahead of Yates.

A lot of posters on here were calling for Mo to be dropped immediatetly so don't think there can be too many complaints on that. Gleeson is a little confusing though, unless he is on graduated return to play or something. Yesterday's side did look very ad-hoc overall, Yates and Latham really shouldn't be playing in the same side and it leaves the top six short of firepower. I get it if Yates will drop in for Latham when Latham leaves (does and will he leave soon??) I think the bowling overall is alright but we are, no matter which way you look at it, an explosive batsman short without Mo. I'm not sure a Bethell return will happen, unfortunately, but that would solve it.

Overall though, I sort of get the feeling that not qualifying for the QFs and having experimented a bit is in line with the clubs ambitions this year. If we sneak 4th, get Hants away and get battered in the QF, it really just continues the run of form that got Robinson sacked. It's just that any experimentation or introduction of academy players this year hasn't really happened, at least successfully, either.

Yeah it was good to see Mouse get a score yesterday. His development was definitely skew whiff in the last year or so. I'd like to see him focus on all format batting and not get too distracted with bowling and hanging around representative squads from here. It's a bit if a problem if, for example, Malik gets rhe five slot in cc rather than our own academy product.

Devon_Bear wrote:

It was an excellent performance last night, some good bowling and sensible batting in the run chase. Young Mousley played a couple of streaky shots early on, but settled down to play a disciplined innings. There's no doubt batting with Hain was a big factor in his this. I would like to see Mousley bat at 5 in the CC, batting in between Hain at 4 & Barnard at 6 would help him no end. I would really like to see him selected for all the remaining CC games this season, he needs a decent run of games instead of playing 2 or 3 & then getting dropped.

I don't think they will play Yates and Latham together unless it's a real emergency, think it more likely they would promote Sheikh, Malik or Jani. Perhaps Yates in the squad as good fielder and for later when Latham is out...

Highveld wrote:

Based on recent form, if Lintott and Hassan Ali play, we need to hope the remaining 3 bowlers go for under 30 each, as Lintott & ali are conceding around 100 runs from their 8 overs.

Also, Yates was dropped from the side after the first game, unless there are many injuries to the other batsmen, there is no viable reason to restore him to the side.

Just a matter of interest, how close are the members to having enough signatures to force a SGM?

Despite our grumbling earlier, I think we're actually well-placed now. On the assumption we don't fall apart and lose here we'll gain ground on Somerset ahead and Durham and Hampshire should be further away below. This morning is a demonstration of why not to the Kook in UK though. Lose any time to the weather and it's a draw. There could have been more results today with full days across the country.