The way to take wickets hasn't changed at all in the history of the game, no point in bowling short unless a batsman is poor against the short ball but on a pitch like this, it should only be used as a way to vary things, not an attacking option. Bowling tight and maintaining a line/length consistently especially against batsmen nowadays who love to hit out at every opportunity, is till the best way and in this game, we have given too many boundaries away and released pressure very quickly.

Yes, need a wicket soon and break this partnership. Woakes hasn't bowled too well this game, too many loose balls, now is the time to strike and get himself into the game again.

I used to see about 5 Sussex supporters who used to come to Edgbaston whenever Sussex were there in CC games and we had over the last few seasons, beaten them and with a few runs being put on from batsmen 8-11 and I remember him saying to his friends, "That's the trouble when we play Warwickshire, we're never through them, you have to take 10 wickets to get them out and getting to 7 down is never always easy after that...". I wonder if that same person is saying that now, a really terrific partnership has now given us the momentum and a spring in our step. In the end, a good morning.

A 250 lead would be something to make them think but with 5 wickets left, if they don't get a good star tomorrow, the field spreads and we knock it about. I think we know how to take it from here and batting till lunch would see us well in charge and 300+ ahead. I think 270 minimum would see us bowl with confidence.

Things change quickly, Woakes hasn't got his radar.

Looking better, 220-6 and a superb partnership from 117-6. The 'Wizard' and Smith.

Just looked on their site, someone there needs to look again at our first game v Surrey as it appears whoever typed it, thinks we batted first and spent the first 4 sessions batting and then bowled out Surrey for 328.

I think we should get a spinner in just for variation and being early season, so many batsmen will not have any real form so facing a spinner will be as difficult as facing pace bowler. Mason Crane got 8 wickets for Glamorgan against Yorkshire so why don't we just try it.

No better practice at playing the long-form game than CC practice playing the long-form game but this lot of clowns who are picking and supposedly running the team should have picked someone else just to try and close up the series. Keeping someone so young, away from playing is criminal to the point where in a few years he could sit back and actually work out how little he has played per year. It happened with Woakes after 2012, they pulled him out of so many games that season so that he didn't actually play that much in the CC and then continued to do it every year including one winter where he played no games and when all the CC games started the next season, the ECB said he couldn't play as he needed to rest.

I am sure at one point, when Paul Collingwood played in the IPL, he went a whole season without a game or maybe just played one. Bethell will no doubt be played in the 1st Test with barely any cricket, the last IPL game is 31st May and the 1st Test is 4th June v New Zealand. Even if he gets left out and is allowed to go home, how much cricket will he be able to play. Our last CC game starts on 15th May and then it's The T20 Blast so he would be unlikely to have any CC cricket and even if he did, not enough to really make an assessment of his form. Hand all the power to India and this is what we get.

I left at 3, not a big fan of watching my teams being 'Milked' about but nice that I didn't have to have my coat on. The catches dropped, have been disappointing as has watching one go past the only slip we had, before lunch, not sure why just one slip when we needed wickets. Another batting strip that never changed throughout the 4 days, hope we have some with a bit more in them for the rest of the season.

I am not hoping they score 100-2 during the first session, just pointing out that they would be in a vulnerable position. Their tail is quite long if Foakes doesn't fire again. I still think we are slight favourites.

I told myself I would be happy with 3 wickets tonight seeing as it is still a good pitch and even if they score 100-2 in the first session tomorrow, that is still only 50 odd ahead with half the side out. A really good lead and I hope this situation isn't too much for our bowlers even though they should be fresh but they won't be 100% match-fit just yet. A good day though and yes, bloody cold, more layers tomorrow I think, come on lads let's get off to the best start ever, v Surrey with a max points win.

A constant 4 per over from start to finish which was good considering we all sounded a bit nervous yesterday about the mornings batting but none of our batsmen ever really looked uncomfortable and to be honest, Surrey's bowling looked very ordinary. I have noticed over the last 4 seasons that they don't have many 5-wicket hauls from their bowlers, they appear to share all the wickets out whereby everyone takes a few here and there but today that wasn't the case. I thought everyone batted superbly. What was a surprise was keeping Lawrence on for so long with his very simple 'Milk-It-Around' bowling which just fed us runs whilst he never looked like doing much damage and even his wicket was just a giveaway. Hopefully, at some stage tomorrow we will have a big lead and time to have a go at them for a decent amount of time in their 2nd innings. A good day but bloody hell, that wind was strong and I am not talking about my own personal habits by the way.

If there is one thing to take from today, it is that Foakes got those runs by playing himself in unlike the numpties who went to Australia. If anything, this should hopefully get him into the Test side as playing in the way he does was probably why McCullum didn't want him in the side. If anyone wants to really get a good take on what McCullum is really like, read Andy Moles' book, his time as New Zealand coach was interesting and paints a really poor picture of what an arrogant bighead 'Baz' was/is.

It's all going wrong and from 65-6, Surrey will feel so good about this. We have served up a few pies and could still be in the field first thing tomorrow. Quite glad I didn't go.

'The Wizard', he's here, he's ours and no one can take him away from us.

Cold everywhere I think and that's why I didn't go, the weather looked poor on the forecast and I have hurt my back, too many weights on Wednesday and then a 4 mile run yesterday when still in a bit of pain. Will go tomorrow though, my gloves, Beanie (A 'Murphy's' one free with a pack of 4 cans) thick coat and flask are at the ready. A great start and seamers who have been relentless all morning.

My point is why pick a batsman (He can't be classed as an allrounder) who averages 10 runs per innings fewer than Malik and who has 10 first-class wickets in 44 games. If Webster can bowl off-spin and Yates bowled well last season, they could be a better bet. I just hope that Malik doesn't feel as though he's been let-down by his exclusion.

Mousley might have played ODI's but is not anywhere being in England's best XI and very rarely bowls in CC matches. He also doesn't spin it much, it's more medium pace.